MISINTERRUPTION
The court plays an important role in our life,
an increase in crime rates and the need for justice has become important, now
whereas we are talking about justice, the verdict of the court merely and most
importantly depends upon the evidence and witness. Now, where many people are
unaware of the procedures of the courts are misguided.
The victim gets
justices only and only if the witness and evidences are in his/her favour. It
is just not for the victim but also for the accused. If all the shreds of evidence
are in his favour the verdict is passed in his favor.
Evidence in
simple language is proof, which is presented in the court, in front of the
judge during the hearings or trails. In short they are the facts presented in
the case/court by the advocate of the party to make the case strong.
Evidence can be
Physical or documented, now after the amendment in the Evidence Act, Digital
Evidences are also accepted by the courts to prove the crime under section 3 of
Evidence Act.
But, in most of
the cases the evidences are false i.e. the statement made in front of the court
is not true.
Section 191,
under Indian Penal Code 1860 the statement made by taking an oath in the court,
turns to be false or can’t be believed is a shred of false evidence.
Example: suppose
Mr Y dies out of suicide but certain people file a petition of murder, though
on the crime spot the officer did not found a suicide note, whereas later one
of his family members informed the officer about the suicide note, now Mr Y son
Mr Z is called to recognize the handwriting of his father, even after knowing that it is not his
father’s handwriting he states that it’s his father’s handwriting is termed as
a false statement made by Mr Z. In this,
there is no mistake of the son, and cannot be held liable under section 193 of IPC. The note provided in the court was false.
Providing or
misguiding the court with false evidence is termed as a crime under the Indian
Penal Code. Any person including the public servant touches or fabricates the
evidence have to appear in judicial proceedings.
Misleading and
misguiding the court with false evidence by any person will be punished with
imprisoning of 7 years along with a fine, whereas any one outside the court
is found providing false evidence will be imprisoned with 3 years and fine.
It is a non – cognizable offence.
Under section
194 and 195A of Indian Penal Code deals with the person who misleads the court
in gracious acts like murder or rape with false evidence.
Remember Courts
are made for Justice, misleading or misguiding with false statement can put you
in consequences, do not mislead or misguided anyone inside or outside the
court.
To be continued...


Comments
Post a Comment